Interpretable Credit Scoring for Microfinance Borrowers with Gradient Boosting and SHAP

Fajar Nugraha, Maya Putri

Jurnal Teknologi dan Inovasi, Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026), pp. 30-40

Abstract

Microfinance institutions increasingly use machine learning to assess loan applicants, but regulators and loan officers require explanations for each decision. This study builds a gradient-boosted credit scoring model on 26,000 historical microloans and uses SHAP values to explain individual predictions. The model achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.81, compared with 0.74 for the logistic regression scorecard currently in use. Repayment history with the institution, business tenure, and group-lending membership were the most influential features. A usability study with twelve loan officers found that SHAP-based explanation cards made it easier to justify approvals and rejections to applicants. The findings suggest that interpretable boosting models can improve accuracy without sacrificing the transparency that microfinance lending requires.

Keywords: credit scoring; gradient boosting; SHAP; explainable AI; microfinance

1. Introduction

This section introduces the problem of financial technology addressed in this study, reviews the main approaches reported in prior work, and states the research objectives.

2. Methods

We describe the data, the proposed approach, the baselines, and the evaluation protocol used to assess the results summarised in the abstract.

3. Results and Discussion

The results are presented and compared with the baselines. Limitations and practical implications for deployment are discussed.

4. Conclusion

The study shows that the proposed approach is effective for the stated objectives and outlines directions for future work.

References

  1. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
  2. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.
  3. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324